Author Archives: Michael Korican

About Michael Korican

A long-time media artist, Michael’s filmmaking stretches back to 1978. Michael graduated from York University film school with Special Honours, winning the Famous Players Scholarship in his final year. The Rolling Stone Book of Rock Video called Michael's first feature 'Recorded: Live!' "the first film about rock video". Michael served on the board of L.I.F.T. when he lived in Toronto during the eighties and managed the Bloor Cinema for Tom and Jerry. He has been prolific over his past eight years in Victoria, having made over thirty-five shorts, won numerous awards, produced two works for BravoFACT! and received development funding for 'Begbie’s Ghost' through the CIFVF and BC Film.

Zapruder Films seeks Canadian female feature writer for dev deal

Posted on by
Reply

Because they don’t feel the Canadian feature film industry is doing enough to bridge the gender gap, Matthew Miller and Matt Johnson of Toronto’s Zapruder Films have launched a program to help support the development of one emerging female screenwriter.

They will be giving all of their $12,000 Telefilm development funds to one woman to develop a treatment into a first draft narrative feature script.

The rules:

“The contest opens September 8, 2016 and closes September 18, 2016.
The winner will be announced on Friday, September 30.
Applicants must not have written a produced feature length screenplay.
Scripts must be the original work of a female writer and must be written originally in English. Adaptations and translated scripts are not eligible.
The writer must be a Canadian citizen or permanent resident.
The writer must agree to option the material to Zapruder Films for a 24 month period.
The writer must not be a member of any screenwriting unions or guilds.”

Your single PDF application must be at least seven pages:

“One page synopsis of the film
A short treatment of the film (5-10 pages)
A short brief addressing what your film means to you (300 word maximum)”

I asked Matthew and Matt what sort of response their program has received:

“The response has been really encouraging. There have already been several submissions and dozens of inquiries as to the specifics of the rules and regulations. For the most part, it is very hard for young writers without an agent to get their foot in the door. Most companies don’t accept unsolicited works so we think that alone has provided a breath of fresh air. And it is trying to help address the issue of gender disparity in our industry and that has helped to spawn a healthy and spirited debate on social media. We couldn’t be happier with where things are at this early in the program.”

My take: I applaud Zapruder Films for this program. It’s smart on two counts: firstly, they’re addressing the gender imbalance in the Canadian feature film industry. Hey, it’s 2016 already. Secondly, these guys want to encourage new, as-yet-unheard voices, with new, interesting stories to tell. As we all know, story is king, or in this case, queen.

So bad, it’s good — vindicated!

Posted on by
Reply

Keyvan Sarkhosh and Winfried Menninghaus of the Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics have legitimized your cinematic guilty pleasures.

Their study, “Enjoying trash films: Underlying features, viewing stances, and experiential response dimensions”, published in Poetics 57, is the first scholarly study of otherwise unredeemable movies.

For instance, in discussing Sharknado, they say:

“Apart from flying sharks, blood and guts are the main ingredients of this surprise trash hit. At first glance it seems paradoxical that someone should deliberately watch badly made, embarrassing and sometimes even disturbing films, and take pleasure in them. To such viewers, trash films appear as an interesting and welcome deviation from the mainstream fare. We are dealing here with an audience with above-average education, which one could describe as ‘cultural omnivores’. Such viewers are interested in a broad spectrum of art and media across the traditional boundaries of high and popular culture.”

My take: Sometimes you just have to see a bad movie to put the better ones into perspective.

CRTC rewrites the rules for indie funds!

Posted on by
Reply

In a surprise move that comes into effect this Thursday, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission is rewriting the rules when it comes to indie producers accessing Certified Independent Production Funds.

Among the changes, the CRTC is:

  • Eliminating the requirement that producers obtain a broadcast licence or development agreement to receive CIPF funding.
  • Allowing and encouraging CIPFs to allocate funding for script and concept development.
  • Allowing and encouraging CIPFs to allocate funding for promotion and discoverability.
  • Allowing CIPFs to fund productions achieving at least six Canadian certification points (down from eight), and include the pilot projects recognized by the Commission.
  • Including co-ventures in productions eligible to receive CIPF funding.

Responding to the new policy framework, Andra Sheffer, CEO of the Independent Production Fund, states:

“The Independent Production Fund has long been an advocate for the support of Canadian content for platforms other than television and because of its endowment, has been able to fund scripted series designed for the web. Therefore, the IPF is encouraged by the CRTC decision to allow other certified Funds which receive their funding from BDUs, to potentially finance projects with no broadcast licence. This will provide the flexibility that our system needs to keep up with evolving production and business opportunities and the demands of modern audiences. Web content allows for innovation and experimentation in story-telling – we have seen it in the web series we have funded over the past 6 years. With few gatekeepers and risk-adverse broadcasters, it encourages new talents to explore and create new forms of story-telling and content that do not typically work on the traditional television platform.”

There are over a dozen Certified Independent Production Funds in Canada.

My take: I think this is a clear signal that the CRTC and Heritage Canada (see ‘by ministerial portfolio’) want to diversify media production and divorce it from television. We shall have to wait and see how the CIPFs respond and how they change their programs.

 

Locarno Film Festival finds future in small and local

Posted on by
Reply

Variety reports on two interesting independent film developments: community and content from Step-In at the Locarno Film Festival.

While lamenting the state of indie film today on one hand, some art houses claim to be  doing great business on the other.

“‘We’re making a profit,’ said Jon Barrenechea, at the U.K.’s Picturehouse Cinemas, which aim to become hubs of community activity all day long and run their own cafes and bars. ‘One thing programmers don’t like to hear is that it isn’t about films but venues,’ he insisted. Last year at Step-In, Barrenechea cited the case of a 243-seat three-screen in Dulwich, a more affluent part of south London, which was doing ‘incredible business,’ with 90% of audiences living within 10 minutes’ walk of the cinema.”

On the content side, Telefilm Canada crowed about its Micro-Budget Production Program.

“Targeting first-time directors, its Talent Fund – a private donation fund whose partners include Bell Media, Corus Ent and Technicolor – finances movies or TV/web narrative content capped at $250,000 per budget and specifically created for digital distribution. 15% or more of Telefilm financing contribution must be dedicated to promotion and distribution. A pioneering experiment, money is raised not by Telefilm but influential local equity investors backing the Fund, and decision-making on projects is left with film schools or fund partners.”

Eurimages’ Roberto Olla posits that the creative freedom this affords allows filmmakers to try new things and expand the definition of cinema.

My take: Interesting to me that we’re back at the local cinema watching engaging small-scale movies.

BitTorrent launches the Discovery Fund

Posted on by
Reply

BitTorrent Inc. wants to promote emerging content producers on the net this year — to the tune of $2,500 to $100K per project.

The Discovery Fund aims to “incubate the world’s next wave of awesome, straight-up brave storytellers and outside voices.”

“Over the next year, BitTorrent aims to partner with 25 creators by providing cash grants and promotional support to build impactful releases and discover new fans. We are looking for artists, musicians, filmmakers, designers and other creators working on uncompromised projects representing a diverse, original perspective seeking global distribution.”

There is no deadline or application fee.

My take: Kudos to BitTorrent for launching this initiative. To their credit, they surveyed artists and learned that “getting their work discovered is the biggest challenge they face.” Amen!

VR stats from England

Posted on by
Reply

Charlotte Rogers of Marketing Week in the UK has reported a raft of VR statistics that are very interesting.

Very nice graphs show:

  • Consumer Sentiments on Virtual Reality
  • What Experiences Would You Like to Have When Using Virtual Reality?
  • What Sorts of Places Would You Like to Get Virtuality Reality Content Related to Your Interests From?

In terms of winning content, the survey points to new, unique experiences as being the most diserable:

“The ability to travel to different cities proves the most popular VR application at 56%, followed by being in the crowd at a concert (52%) and fantasy scenarios, such as flying or walking on water (45%).”

See the original Ipsos MORI media release and raw data.

My take: I just don’t know. Is VR/360 a technology in search of it’s killer app? Or — ? I can’t help but remember the trailer for The Matrix — I think we’ve seen this movie before.

The state of VR to date, in one page

Posted on by
Reply

Janessa Nichole White of VR Dribble offers the best summary of Virtual Reality to date.

She summarizes:

  • VR revenue projections
  • VR market demographics
  • VR hardware sales
  • Content that doesn’t work in VR
  • Content that works in VR
  • VR gadgets
  • Privacy and data tracking in VR

Regarding content that works in VR, she lists:

  • Stationary and interactive puzzle games
  • Horror
  • On-rails vehicle
  • Using 1-to-1 motion controls
  • Using head as a cursor
  • Teleporting from place-to-place
  • Travel and music experiences
  • Social engagement
  • 1st person story segments

She closes with:

“The vernacular hasn’t been created. There are many obstacles in building a VR game or story. The hardware still has room to improve. Despite all of the above, it sure is an exciting time to be alive.”

My take: if you think 360 is just a fad, check out Say Lou Lou‘s Blue on Blue music video for a perfect example of the plasticity of cinema — in four dimensions. It will blow your mind.

 

Flowchart: What to do after film school

Posted on by
Reply

MovieMaker has put together a funny flowchart for film school grads.

It asks a series of questions and depending on your answers, steers you to one of nine occupations.

For instance:

“I went to film school so that I could one day…

Express my original vision

How original?

Well, sort of original

I survived film school…

By stealing ideas from classical films

I want to live:

In Austen —

Indie Auteur!“

My take: I think this is hilarious, particularly as we get ready to relaunch the Short Circuit Film Festival. The convo goes something like this:

“I went to film school so that I could one day…

Work with my cinematic heroes.

I survived film school…

By buttering up my profs

I like to work:

Irregularly —

Festival Director!“

360 is not VR, but still cool

Posted on by
Reply

VR. 360. The next big thing? The same thing?

No, they’re quite different. Blame Apple’s Quicktime VR for mixing up the two. (Released in 1994, QTVR was essentially a single frame from any of today’s 360 videos, not truly a virtual reality environment.)

Raindance‘s Baptiste Charles-Aubert makes a pointed distinction: ‘360 is immersive as opposed to VR which is interactive‘:

“In a Virtual Reality setting, the viewer/player leads. With 360, as filmmakers, we need to keep control over the narrative and push it forward. That’s what happens with 360. The viewer is experiencing a story happening around him and not to him. The physical location then matters even more in 360.”

One neat example of 360 documentary filmmaking is a series of Paul McCartney ‘interviews’ by Jaunt.

Their 360 technology is impressive, with no discernible ‘stitching‘.

My take: If the selfie is the painted self-portrait digitized, what is the equivalent documentary or narrative film? Will it utilize VR or 360? Or are those technologies reserved for something else? The modern, introspective equivalent of album liner notes, perhaps?

Wattpad is the Youtube for writing

Posted on by
1

Nicole LaPorte writes in Fast Company about ‘How A Toronto-Based Storytelling App Is Becoming A Hollywood Idea Factory‘.

That app is Wattpad, a creative writing social media space.

With 45 million monthly users, Hollywood has marketed numerous films and television shows on the platform.

“But now Wattpad wants to more than just help Hollywood market its wares, it wants to help create those wares. Emboldened by the success of Wattpad author Anna Todd, whose serialized story After (over 1.3 billion reads and more than 6 million comments) was optioned in 2014 by Paramount and is being developed into a feature film (it has also been published as a book by Simon & Schuster), Wattpad has created Wattpad Studios, an in-house production company of sorts that will help identify the next Todd’s and partner them with movie studios and TV and digital networks. The hope is to churn out Wattpad-inspired entertainment.”

Wattpad can do that because they have their finger on the pulse of the community.

“Wattpad’s 2 million writers are different from print authors for a variety of reasons. They publish their stories on the fly, posting chapters as soon as they finish them, rather than going through an editing and publishing process that can take months, even years. They also have a very active relationship with their fans which gives them a unique power that studios and networks can use for their own benefit as they’re developing a Wattpad project.”

Moreover, they’ve already succeeded in doing this in the Philippines with a TV series called Wattpad Presents.

As quoted on Mashable, Aron Levitz, head of Wattpad Studios, points out:

“We have a distinct advantage over other social networks who trade in images or talent. We trade in the atomic unit of the entertainment and publishing industry: Stories.”

My take: I find it interesting that a social media platform seeks to intermediate between a creator and an industry, presumably for a cut of the deal. True, they created the platform allowing writers to create for and communicate directly with their audiences. Is this just another way of saying talent is always rewarded? Is this truly a new economic model, or is it just using the crowd to read the slush pile? I want it to be the former but until the money starts flowing in a new way, I think it’s the latter.