Cannes 2022: film quotas drive national production

Scott Roxborough reports in The Hollywood Reporter that Wall Street Hits the Croisette: Why Private Equity Investors Are Bullish on Indie Film.

He claims:

“Private equity, or PE, firms are pumping money into the entertainment content, financing independent production and snatching up companies at a level never seen before in the indie industry…. Some of the biggest players packaging projects and inking deals on the Croisette have backing from private equity groups…. The bet PE investors are making is that the explosive growth in streaming services will lead to a similar demand boom for content. And that the companies that own the IP, the original films and TV shows the streamers need, will be best positioned to benefit.”

He traces this demand squarely back to government policy:

“Many see particularly strong growth potential in Europe, where European Union (EU) content quotas for SVOD platforms — 30 percent of all content on streaming services in Europe must be European-made — has created guaranteed demand for original, home-grown films and series which most streamers will be unable to fill on their own.”

As to Cannes, filmmaker Jeremy Lutter (pictured above) compares this year’s experience with previous ones:

“Cannes is in some ways the same and in some ways different. I would say it’s two thirds the size as previous non-COVID years in terms of events. But, considering the situation, it’s impressive! The crowds are smaller but it’s still busy. As for deals — people are looking — there’s been less movies made recently — everyone is hungry for movies. Oh yeah, instead of a gift bag, this year you get a PPE mask with a logo on it!”

My take: of course, quotas drive national production. We proved that with CanCon and Canadian music; witness the dozens of Canadian superstars, who, as Simu Liu points out about Shawn Mendes, Avril Lavigne and Arcade Fire, “like me have fulfilled the ultimate Canadian dream of making it in America — but to our credit, we always come back!”

Michael Korican to host Q & A at Short Circuit Pacific Rim Film Festival

Thursday night, May 5, 2022, at the Vic Theatre, Victoria, BC.

As you may know, I’m the current President of CineVic, Victoria’s largest media arts centre, and sound editor and co-producer of its podcast, Push In.

I’m also the Selection Committee Chair of its Short Circuit Pacific Rim Short Film Festival.

It’s in that capacity that I’ll be hosting the Questions and Answers for Thursday night’s screening.

Joining us will be:

  • Joyce Kline (Director, Cancelled Stamp)
  • Jocelyn Russell (Producer, Cancelled Stamp)
  • Tammy Tsang (Director, Lauren in the Bathroom)
  • David Lennon (Actor, Wallpaper)

The films are:

  1. A Tight Ten (California • 17 mins • Chelsea Spirito)
  2. Cancelled Stamp (Victoria • 13 mins • Joyce Kline)
  3. Fumes (Singapore • 7 mins • Dominic Graham)
  4. Wallpaper (Vancouver • 9 mins • Tanya Jade)
  5. Lauren in the Bathroom (Vancouver • 2 mins • Tammy Tsang)
  6. The Old Man Next Door (New Zealand • 15 mins • Aidan Otene Dickens)
  7. Purea (New Zealand • 6 mins • Kath Akuhata-Brown)

My take: Honoured to do this!

Truly Independent Film Distribution

John Staton writes in the Wilmington Star-News that self-distributed Independent Wilmington film comedy ‘Birdies’ shoots for a golf-loving audience.

“Instead of going the festival route or trying to get distribution through Amazon and other large streaming sites, which are both strategies often employed by independent filmmakers, the makers of “Birdies” have employed a direct-to-the-consumer approach. It recalls a digital version of the “four-walling” of decades ago, when filmmakers would rent space in theaters across the country to ensure their movies were available to audiences.”

The feature is available to stream on demand at birdiesthemovie.com. There’s also merch for sale.

My take: this is the first time I’ve seen outtakes for sale! I could be wrong but it seems they’re using seer.la to stream the movie and pixpa.com for the store.

Apple sues filmmaker over trademark

Apple has sued Ukrainian film director Vasyl Moskalenko, who wrote and directed the Kickstarter-backed action-comedy movie Apple-Man, for trademark infringement.

Apple’s claim is that there are “likelihood of confusion” and “dilution by blurring”.

Here’s the film’s trailer, shot in the director’s apartment during lockdown:

Folks with longer memories will remember that this is not the first time “Apple” has been involved in litigation over its name.

Way back in 1978, the Beatles sued Steve Jobs (really Apple Corps. vs. Apple Computer.) Apple Computer settled by paying the Beatles $80,000 and promising to stay out of the music business.

In 1991, after the integration of MIDI (remember the sosumi system sound?) Apple Computer paid another $26.5 million to Apple Corps.

Almost 30 years later, with the rise of iTunes, the two parties finally settled. From Wikipedia:

As revealed on 5 February 2007, Apple Inc. and Apple Corps reached a settlement of their trademark dispute under which Apple Inc. will own all of the trademarks related to “Apple” and will license certain of those trademarks back to Apple Corps for their continued use. The settlement ends the ongoing trademark lawsuit between the companies, with each party bearing its own legal costs, and Apple Inc. will continue using its name and logos on iTunes. The settlement includes terms that are confidential, although newspaper accounts at the time stated that Apple Computer was buying out Apple Corps’ trademark rights for a total of $500 million.”

My take: still not sure anyone can own the trademark on a fruit. Apple, surely you recognize that Instant Karma‘s gonna get yah in the end! Come on Apple, grow up and just make a deal to license Apple-Man on Apple TV+.

Is streaming the only hope for independent film?

Ryan Faughnder queries in the LA Times: “Is streaming the only hope for independent film?”

As the 2022 Sundance Film Festival goes virtual for a second year, Ryan reports:

“Film financier Jason Cloth, the Toronto-based chief executive of Creative Wealth Media, which works closely with Canadian production company Bron Studios, is now convinced that making small indie dramas for movie theaters is a sucker’s game:”

“I don’t think producers can look at these films as being theatrically released. Going forward, you’re going to have to look at these films as being produced for the streaming market. That’s the only market for them. I need to understand what everyone’s thinking in terms of exit before I’m comfortable putting up money. And now, I’m not all that comfortable seeing independent film pitched to me with a theatrical exit, and I’m quite vocal to people, telling them, ‘I think you’re delusional.’ And then they pull out films from three, four years ago, and say ‘Look at how they did.’ I’m like, ‘That was three, four years ago. This is a new world.’

The pandemic is to blame for the art house audience abandoning theatres. The Quorum, Cultique, Fanthropology reveal in their report Exhibition At A Crossroads that viewers over 35 are the most reluctant to return, especially women.

My take: the other reasons, of course, are the rise of streaming, brought about by the digital evolution, and the corresponding splintering of audiences from one mass into many niches.

Jim Cummings says don’t get screwed by agencies

Eric Kohn of IndieWire quotes Jim Cummings as saying, “Agencies don’t actually care about independent film,” in Your Agent Is a Con Artist: ‘The Beta Test’ Director Jim Cummings Wants to Liberate Indie Filmmaking.

Cummings’s thesis is that no one can do a better job monetizing your film than you. He says, “You have to have some business savvy in order to do anything. The film industry is no different, and you shouldn’t give your movie to people who don’t really care about the thing.”

His new movie The Beta Test is about how agencies package deals with their talent. Cummins explains, “The point was to inoculate independent filmmakers to not want to participate in that world — to not be fucked over by the way this culture is built. That has been my raison d’être over the last 10 years.”

Kohn asks, “If the movie is a cautionary tale, what would you like to see filmmakers do instead?” and Cummings replies:

“Exactly what we did. The story of the movie is that agencies don’t actually care about independent film. They care about money and power. But the way we made the film was completely circumventing that system. We ran a Wefunder campaign. It’s a crowd equity platform. We made the movie in our offices with our friends cast in all the parts. We did all of the distribution by ourselves without sales agents. The future is going to be a lot more like talented YouTubers making 90-minute pieces of content. That’s what real democracy is. You can waste a huge amount of your life working for people who don’t care about you.”

My take: This is a great read, and advice to heed. For review, please see Mark Duplass‘s seminal presentation The Calvary Is Not Coming.

Crazy8s deadline coming soon

This Monday, October 25, 2021, at 11:59 pm, is the deadline to apply to Crazy8s on Film Freeway.

Since 1999, Vancouver’s Crazy8s has produced 127 short films. The Crazy8s Film Society exists to provide funding and support to emerging filmmakers to help them produce short films and to train crew and cast.

Each Writer, Directer and Producer team submits a 3-minute video pitch. Forty semi-finalists will be contacted by November 15 to schedule a time to pitch in-person to a jury of industry professionals on either November 20 or 21, 2021.

Next, twelve semi-finalists go into a story editing phase and work with a professional Script Editor.

Then the Top 6 Teams receive almost $50,000-worth of camera, lighting and grip packages, $1000 cash, and mentorship throughout the duration of their 8-day production and delivery of their final films.

The process culminates with a Gala Screening and AfterParty slated for April 9, 2022, in Vancouver.

My take: I’ve seen a number of Crazy8s films over the years and have always been impressed with their professionalism. Highly recommended.

TV Showrunner Bootcamp: apply now!

BIPOC writers take note: here’s a great way to advance in episodic television.

The BIPOC TV & Film Showrunner Training Bootcamp is a 4-day workshop-style intensive for mid-level to senior writers. Led by writer and executive producer, Anthony Q. Farrell, along with special guest instructors and panellists, the workshop will train up to 50 writers on best practices in managing and staffing their writing rooms, managing production and post-production schedules, and working effectively with production companies and broadcasters.

Farrell says:

“A nice thing about the Canadian Entertainment industry right now is that more doors are opening for BIPOC creators. It’s a beautiful thing. What I’m noticing though, is that many of those creators are being thrown into showrunning without any real preparation or support. The goal of this program is to get mid and upper-level writers ready for the jump to showrunning, demystify elements of the role that are new to them, and to inspire them to take creative control of their series. We’ll go through the nuts and bolts of the job so they’re mostly ready for the opportunity if and when it arises.”

The Showrunner Training Bootcamp is open to Canadian writers who are Black, Indigenous, and/or racialized (Persons of Colour). To be eligible you must also meet at least one of the following criteria:

  1. You have or had a show (web or TV) in development with a Canadian broadcaster or with a production company; or,
  2. You have attained a producer-level credit on at least one season of a Canadian TV or web series; or,
  3. You have a story editor credit on an animated series.

Here’s the program:

Week 1 (October 16): Managing and staffing your creative team

  • What to look for when hiring, where to find your writers
  • How to cultivate a safe working environment
  • How to communicate and delegate effectively
  • How and when to promote junior writers
  • How to work best with story editors/coordinators
  • How to manage relationships and set realistic expectations with producers
  • How to manage a co-showrunning relationship

Week 2 (October 23): Managing Schedules
Guest Instructor: Jim Corston

  • Breaking down line producing and budgets
  • Pitfalls for showrunners to avoid
  • Determining budget realities and priorities
  • Staying within your budget and production schedule
  • Special session on notes; who gives them, when, pushing back, communicating them to writers

Week 3 (November 6): Production & Post Production
Guest Instructor: Dave Huband

  • Post production workflow from day one to delivery
  • Tracking dailies
  • Working with editors (giving and taking notes)
  • What to look for at the mix and in colour correction

Week 4 (November 20): Managing Relationships + Wrap-up
Guest Panellists: Marsha Greene, Floyd Kane, Vera Santamaria

  • Building and managing relationships with your writers, actors, crew, non-writing producers, broadcasters
  • Panel featuring showrunners from Canada and the US

Apply by September 19, 2021 here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScCjxsiHG0GN0bqQb9EPhk3N8A5ar78eIaMb2gzX4JnmKVO4Q/viewform?usp=sf_link

My take: Ana de Lara, this is for you!

Nestflix catalogs the films within films

Mimicking Netflix, Nestflix is a new website by web designer Lynn Fisher.

“Fictional movies within movies? Got ‘em. Fake shows within shows? You bet. Browse our selection of over 400 stories within stories.”

Just launched on August 11, 2021, Lynn has already received a ton of new submissions!

Ian Carlos Campbell writes in The Verge:

“It’s a fascinating look at how self-referential most modern film and TV is (there are a lot of fake sequels), but also how ingrained Netflix’s content strategy and interface are in our culture generally. It’s one thing to cut away to a scene from a fake movie or show during a comedy, but it’s a whole other thing to have it packaged up with stills, art, and metadata like it’s ready to stream. It doesn’t make any of the fake movies or shows feel more real, but it does make them funny all over again.”

My take: My latest project has a dozen films within a film. And one of those has a film within a film within a film. That’s the Wes Anderson episode, natch.

‘Black Widow’ box office woes

Rebecca Rubin reports in Variety that Movie Theater Owners Blame Marvel’s ‘Black Widow’ Box Office ‘Collapse’ on Disney Plus Launch.

She writes, “Movie theater operators did not mince words in asserting that Disney left money on the table by putting Marvel’s “Black Widow” on Disney Plus on the same day as its theatrical debut.”

The theatre owners are concerned about Disney+ password sharing and digital pirating. Of course, they don’t get a cut of any legitimate streaming revenue as well.

According to The Numbers, the 14-month delayed Black Widow earned $80,366,312 on its first domestic weekend and a total of $314,906,683 internationally after 16 days.

Compare those numbers with the 12-month delayed F9: The Fast Saga that earned $70,043,165 on it first domestic weekend and a total of $621,096,825 internationally after 30 days.

So even though Black Widow bested F9 on its opening weekend, it has earned only half as much in total to date.

Is this because F9 has been out for twice as long? No. In my opinion, the difference is explained by the fact that Black Widow has yet to be released in China.

Variety has also reported:

“Beijing tends to program Hollywood blockbusters sparingly in the key moviegoing month of July to carve out space for local productions. This year, its resistance to scheduling foreign films has been exacerbated by the critical 100th anniversary of the ruling Communist Party’s founding on July 1. The occasion has been accompanied by an ongoing, months-long period of militant censorship across all media that will last through the end of the month and likely into fall.”

Back to The Numbers to see F9 earned $216,935,000 in China — this in the five weeks before its release in North America.

Comparing the two movies side by side, we see international box office for F9 is $457,800,000 versus only $160,100,000 for Black Widow.

My take: the moral of the story is: don’t release a blockbuster in July.