About Michael Korican

A long-time media artist, Michael’s filmmaking stretches back to 1978. Michael graduated from York University film school with Special Honours, winning the Famous Players Scholarship in his final year. The Rolling Stone Book of Rock Video called Michael's first feature 'Recorded: Live!' "the first film about rock video". Michael served on the board of L.I.F.T. when he lived in Toronto during the eighties and managed the Bloor Cinema for Tom and Jerry. He has been prolific over his past eight years in Victoria, having made over thirty-five shorts, won numerous awards, produced two works for BravoFACT! and received development funding for 'Begbie’s Ghost' through the CIFVF and BC Film.

Knowing your audience is key to success with your indie project

Even ten years ago, ‘show business’ was highly organized. See this excellent report by Strategy Analytics.

But that model has been challenged by the addition of millions of screens, many of which you carry around as phones, tablets and laptops; the explosion of content, made possible by plunging production costs; and the rise of the Internet, acting as the conduit between viewer and media.

Very simplistically, the old, analogue, model was:

  1. Make the movie
  2. Sell your movie to a distributor
  3. Hand it over so they can exploit it in every market through each window.

There is no one new model: everyone is coming up with their own strategy. It’s still the Wild West. What might work for one film won’t necessarily work for the next.

I believe the key elements are: the Internet, content want to be free, people will reward (pay for) excellent content, video, mobile, watch whatever whenever, and on and on.

One major difference with the new model is that there is no middle man required any more.

Very simplistically, the new, digital, model is:

  1. Make the movie
  2. Exploit the movie.

The key for me is ‘Audience’ — you want to be as close to your audience as possible. You need to involve them in the project’s journey. The thinking here is the more involved they are, the more invested they are and the greater the chance they will support the project. Support is one or all of: talk about it, invest in it, share about it, rent/buy it.

Who is your audience?

Once you know that you can implement this plan:

MK’s Marketing Plan: use Crowd Funding and Web Presence to connect Audience with Release Platforms.

Use Crowd Funding to build awareness: it’s not about the money, it’s about making pre-sales to your audience: make the $10 reward a film viewing. So you might have a ridiculously low goal and then some stretch goals. The real goal is to sign up fans; any money you make is pure bonus. (You should not count on crowd funding to raise your production budget — make it low-to-no-budget so lack money can’t stop you.)

Create a Web Presence: your project needs an online identity. Website, Facebook page, Youtube/Vimeo space, Twitter feed. Again to attract fans. To disseminate news. To show your crowd funding video, behind the scenes videos, etc.

Choose your Release Platforms: the goal is to make enough more to make your next film so you need both SVOD (think Netflix) and VOD (think iTunes) platforms.

Indie filmmaker Douglas Horn has researched this and chose IndieFlix for the curated browsing space and ReelHouse for a rental/sales platform.

Two last thoughts: theatrical and festivals.

The only thing you could consider with Theatrical is to “four wall” the project if you have a niche audience. If you have a distinct, built-in audience, you could rent a theatre and market directly to them. 100 people at $10 each = $1000, less cost of theatre. See TUGG for a crowd sourced pull theatrical strategy.

Festivals — I have to admit I’m not a big fan. You can spend a lot of time and money submitting. For what? Unless you get into the big ones, maybe a hundred people show up on a Friday afternoon and you win an award. That’s the promise. I think in the beginning your time is better spent working your Marketing Plan. Once you get the ball rolling, festivals will take more notice and then you can get into bigger ones. But thinking festivals will get the ball rolling for you is dreaming, IMHO.

My take: Mark Duplass begs to differ. At SXSW he says submit to every festival under the sun. I think festivals should only be a part of your marketing strategy.

Avoid these six indie film mistakes

Filmmaker Dianne ‘shit has got to change’ Bell recently posted her thoughts on why some indie films ‘aren’t very good at all’ in ‘Six Mistakes that Will Sink Your Film’.

The six mistakes are:

  1. The script isn’t very good
  2. The budget/schedule are over-ambitious
  3. The director decides to take on every job
  4. The casting is cynical
  5. You don’t tech scout
  6. Great camera package, but no budget for production design

Here’s what she says about production design:

“It doesn’t matter what fancy camera you use, if what you put in front the camera is ugly, it will look ugly. Get a cheaper camera and spend money on the interiors that you are going to shoot in, and I swear your film will benefit from it. Take time to really think about the color palette of your film. Too often low budget indies are shot in friends’ homes with little thought or care about the palettes of the interiors and they suffer for it.”

Talking about colour palettes, see the excellent Movies in Color and Roxy Radulescu‘s thoughts on the power of colour.

My take: I agree with Dianne. Personally, I like films with a point (otherwise they’re pointless) and upbeat endings (don’t waste my time with a depressing ending.) And anything that highlights film’s plasticity — temporally or spatially, etc.

The best summary of the mediascape to date

The excellent CMF Trends has released another excellent white paper: Content Everywhere 2: Securing Canada’s Place in the Digital Future by the Canadian Media Production Association.

The 33-page report focusses on developments in the ‘linear, original digital content space’ in Canada, the US and the UK.

With facts and figures, it outlines the ‘videofication’ of the Internet:

“CISCO predicts that video traffic will be 79% of all consumer Internet traffic in 2018, up from 66% in 2013. Internet video is growing at a rapid pace, increasing fourfold by 2018 and consumer VOD traffic will double by 2018. For example, the amount of VOD traffic by 2018 will be equivalent to six billion DVDs per month.”

The report next analyzes the SVOD trend, OTT original content, nimble Internet successes and old media forays.

Case studies from all three countries follow.

One conclusion:

“The biggest obstacle is discoverability in a crowded marketplace –- and the only way to address this challenge is to produce a show that you know has an audience.”

The report closes with this summary of common characteristics of digital-first content across all markets:

  • Global, universal stories
  • Pre-existing and demonstrable digital audience
  • Underserved audiences (in traditional media)
  • Unique creative, perhaps unsuited to traditional media
  • Creative appealing to younger digital audiences
  • Premium talent or ‘event’ programming
  • ‘Digital native’ skills (social media, community building experience)
  • Transmedia competency to market and support content

My take: worth the time to read! Excellent insights and case studies. The takeaway is that you no longer make something for a comissioner/distributor, you make it for your audience. BONUS: email addresses of Digital-First Buyers in Canada, the UK and the US!

TV speeds up shows to squeeze in more ads

Recently, numerous articles have popped up claiming TV networks speed up their shows in order to play more commercials.

From reddit to CBS, everyone is decrying the practise as a money grab at the expense of the artistic integrity of the original programming.

See proof on Youtube.

You might be surprised to learn this is old news. Snopes.com explored the topic last August. Way back in 2002, everything2 exposed the phenomenon.

The program the networks use is called Time Tailor, a “video time optimization solution” by Prime Image. Check out their Revenue Calculator.

My take: how about they speed up the commercials by 50% instead?

Writersandfilmmakers.com uses the crowd to produce films

Toronto-based Writersandfilmmakers.com has a different approach to short and feature film funding.

I call it a mashup of merit and crowd sourcing.

They’re running two competitions, one for shorts and one for features. Up to 1,000 writers or filmmakers sign up to judge each other’s work. The top filmmaker then gets to select one of the ten top scripts, pays the writer and makes her film.

I asked Jonathan Krimer, via email, why he started this venture:

“As a writer, I recognized that the number one barrier to making a film was funding. Sitting down and writing isn’t too expensive. But making a film is. No matter how much gear you or your friends have, you still need funding. I thought if people could come together and assess each other’s work we would be able to decide which projects to move forward on as a community. Let’s create a community where the participants want the best of the other group. Its a Win-Win-WIN. The last win is the funding.”

The funding comes from the entry fees. When each competition reaches 900-1,000 entrants, fees of $50 for the short film competition and $100 for the feature film competition become payable. The winning short film-maker gets $10,000 to pay the writer of the script they select, $15,000 for principal photography and $10,000 for completion. The winning feature film-maker gets $20,000 to pay the writer of the script they select, $30,000 for principal photography and $20,000 for completion. Writersandfilmmakers.com keeps the remaining fees to cover their overhead.

When each competition begins, each entrant must complete assignments. Filmmakers read and judge scripts. Writers watch and rate films. Writersandfilmmakers.com crunches the numbers to determine the winning filmmaker and the top ten scrips.

Which competition will happen first, short or feature? Any idea when?

“I am predicting the short film competition will occur first because the funding is absolutely insane! 10K for a short script and 25K for a short film?! THAT’S AMAZING! In addition, we have a two to one ratio of short film entries versus feature film entries. As for when, that’s a difficult one to predict. Our current rate of entries is seeing incredible spikes here and there. One day we have 20 entries, the next day we have one. What’s interesting about this competition is the more the word spreads, and the more the community helps spread the word, the faster we can start assessing each others work and funding a film.”

My take: I applaud this venture because it relies purely on writers and filmmakers, and not on funding bodies. Using the crowd to create a meritocracy is laudable. I like that it totally sidesteps issues of commercialization and focusses wholly on scripts and indie filmmaking. The writer prizes are very rich! Given the low entry fees (which are not payable until the competitions reach critical mass) I say go ahead and enter! I only wish there was a way to create communities of writers and directors through this who could collaborate on future projects, perhaps by location, as this is garnering entrants from cities around the world.

Telefilm Micro-Budget Partners

Telefilm will accept one letter of recommendation from each of its 29 partners for the Micro-Budget Production Program.

If you are an emerging filmmaker in Canada, I believe this is your best shot at fully funding your first feature.

Check out the media co-ops in these cities:

My take: worth exploring!

Funding for female filmmakers

As reported at On Screen Manitoba, BravoFACT and BravoFACTUAL will now ensure that 50% of their awards will go to female filmmakers:

“The change is meant to help foster up-and-coming female filmmakers in Canada. In order to qualify as female-lead, a submission must have a director or producer attached who is a woman. In addition, every BravoFACT and BravoFACTUAL jury in 2015 will include a female filmmaker as a guest juror.”

The next deadlines are April 1, 2015 for BravoFACTUAL and June 12, 2015 for BravoFACT.

My take: this is long overdue. Go grab a piece of the pie, sisters! We need to hear your stories more than ever.

7 Steps to financing your first feature for free in Canada

Telefilm recently announced the third version of its excellent two-stage micro-budget feature production contest. I applaud Telefilm for financing 22 features this way and sticking with this program.

Having watched the development of the program over the last three years, here’s my take on how to finance your first feature for free in Canada:

  1. Become a Canadian citizen or landed immigrant.
  2. Join one of the film co-operatives on the Designated Partners list. Consider moving to a cheaper city with less competition.
  3. At the co-op meet a writer member with a feature script you really, really like and want to direct. Convince a producer member to join you two. (By the way, if you can organize a great party AND you can balance your cheque book, consider becoming a Producer — they are in short supply.)
  4. As a trio, make a short film (5-10 minutes) of excerpt scenes from the feature script.
  5. Read this year’s guidelines and get your submission together: second-draft script, budget, marketing plans, pitch video, etc. Telefilm usually announces the Micro-Budget program in October but delayed it until January this year (perhaps due to system changes.)
  6. Submit to your co-op and cross your fingers.
  7. When you’re successful, add the Recommender Letter to your package and submit to Telefilm.

If you’re successful, congratulations! You’ll have $100,000 to $120,000 to make your movie in 12 months and a further three to distribute it digitally.

If you’re not successful, develop a new project and start over. Telefilm will not consider the same project again.

Plus, if you’re not successful at the co-op or Telefilm stages, MAKE THE FILM ANYWAY.

You’re probably asking at least two questions right now:

  1. How can I make the movie when I don’t have the $100K?
  2. How can I ever reapply to the Telefilm Micro-Budget program once I make my first feature?

The answers, as I see it?

  1. The truth is, once you start paying your cast and crew and spending money on renting cameras and equipment, $100K is not enough anyway. If you can entice your co-op buddies and local, non-union actors to collaborate with you on your venture and you use your own or the co-op’s equipment, you’ll actually need much less cash. Maybe $10,000 to $25,000. Find investors or crowd-fund this. You have all the materials you need already!
  2. Telefilm (and CAVCO) calls anything over 74 minutes a feature. If your film looks like a winner, commit to it as your first feature and make it the best possible. If it’s not as great as you wished for your first feature, cut it down to something between 61 and 74 minutes, including credits. That way it will still qualify as a feature at those festivals that use 60 minutes or greater to define features, but it will not be regarded as a feature at Telefilm. This is a case of having your cake and eating it too. You will learn so much by making the film that your next feature pitch will be immeasurably better.

My take: another strategy is to stop waiting to be ‘picked’ and just get on with doing it. As Seth Godin says, the only thing holding you back is your lizard brain.

CineCoup offers $1M plus theatrical release

CineCoup is back!

The film accelerator that brought us Wolf Cop last year has another ‘$1 Million Dollars’ in production funds and a Cineplex Odeon theatrical release up for grabs. Get ready to pitch and work your butts off:

“This time we’re challenging filmmakers to go high concept and create projects that can connect with larger audiences. We’re looking for genre films with franchise potential like action, horror, thriller, sci-fi, and comedy (or documentaries that deal with pop culture tropes such as King of Kong, Indie Game: The Movie, Trekkies, etc.) and we know Canada’s got the good stuff so bring it on!”

Launch your three-person team on Monday, February 9, 2015. After 12 weeks of team challenges beginning in mid-March, at least one project will be greenlit at the Banff World Media Festival in June.

My take: if you have a franchise-ready action, horror, thriller, sci-fi or comedy feature ready to roll AND you have three months free to complete weekly challenges AND you have a large online following AND you like working in public AND you truly believe your concept is the best in the country, then go for it! What do you have to lose?

BravoFACT gets into pitch contests

BravoFACT will be sponsoring two pitch contests at upcoming film events at opposite ends of the country, with two prizes of up to $35,000.

First up is the Victoria Film Festival with a deadline for applications of Friday, January 16 at 5 ET (that’s 2 p.m. in Victoria.) Five finalists will be contacted on Friday, January 30, so they can prepare to give a 10-minute pitch on Friday, February 6.

Next is the WITF-Atlantic’s Women Making Waves Conference with a deadline of Friday, February 5 at 5 ET. Five finalists will be contacted on Friday, February 20, so they can prepare to give a pitch on Saturday, February 28. Note: female applicants only, please.

Send your applications for both Narrative shorts and Documentary shorts to Rachel.feldbloomwood@bellmedia.ca Note: demo reels are not required for these applications.

My take: if you have a script for a narrative film less than 7.5 minutes long or a treatment for a documentary shorter than 15 minutes ready to go and you live anywhere near Victoria or Halifax, you MUST apply. BravoFACT is one of the few sources in Canada for truly independent film production funds. Disclosue: I’ve received two BravoFACT awards; one for my short i luv spam and another for Scott Amos’s Scratch.