Category Archives: Cool Tech

LucidCam: 3D camera for the masses

Posted on by
2

Lucid is about to release a stereoscopic video camera that I feel will be the breakthrough ‘VR’ has been waiting for.

The LucidCam ships in July 2017 for just $499. You get:

  • 180° x 180° Field of View, 4K Images jpg, 4K-30fps/eye Videos mp4
  • Single operation button with light and sound indications
  • Built-in stereo audio with dual mics for stereoscopic caption
  • On-board stabilization and merging
  • Supports Micro SD card, micro USB connection, and mini HDMI output
  • Wifi for livestream, data transfer USB 2.0
  • Splash proof (IP54 certified) with accessory options of waterproof case for diving & mounts
  • Apps: iOS and Android

To clarify, this is not ‘virtual reality’. It is not ‘360’. It is ‘3D 180 reality’.

The cute little camera looks like a morph of a phone and a mouse, with two big eyes on one side.

My take: the ease and simplicity of this camera will finally usher in 3D for the masses. ‘3D 180 reality’ most closely resembles how we truly see the world. I think the storytelling applications are very exciting: imagine point-of-view shots that are undeniably real!

Portals Project connects random strangers globally

Posted on by
Reply

Stephanie Elam and Jason Kravarik bring us a story about applied communications technology in CNN Style called The Portals Project: This gold box is ‘better than Facebook’.

The Portals Project is the brainchild of Amar Bakshi.

Each shipping container covered in gold paint is connected by a wall-sized video screen to a doppleganger somewhere else in the world — in any of these countries: Afghanistan, Cuba, Germany, Honduras, India, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kenya, Mexico, Myanmar, Pakistan, Palestine, Rwanda, South Korea, United Kingdom, and the United States.

“Portals are gold spaces equipped with immersive audiovisual technology. When you enter a Portal, you come face-to-face with someone in a distant Portal live and full-body, as if in the same room.”

The Portals connect strangers from very different backgrounds and allow them to converse and to find common ground.

My take: This sounds like a fantastic use of place, technology and the internet to foster communication between people on opposite sides of the world. I envisioned something similar in the early 90’s called “Central Square”. This was to be a network of camera kiosks set up in large public areas in major cities and available to anyone to make statements to the world. At other times, viewers could simply watch what was going on. Then the internet happened and public webcams.

Nostalgic sound used as performance enhancer

Posted on by
Reply

Ian Burrell, writing in The Independent, reports that The Times’ newsroom is set to ring with the sounds of typewriters once more.

“To the surprise of Times journalists, a tall speaker on a stand has been erected in the newsroom to pump out typewriter sounds, to increase energy levels and help reporters to hit deadlines. The audio begins with the gentle patter of a single typewriter and slowly builds to a crescendo, with the keys of ranks of machines hammering down as the paper’s print edition is due to go to press.”

He also references Hanx Writer, an iOS app that turns your iPhone or iPad into a metaphysical typewriter, complete with sounds.

My take: Really? I will admit to liking the analogue machines I once used but that was only until the keys jammed or — oops — a typo! And then you had to find an envelope and — gasp — a postage stamp. Sometimes digital is better. But creating a soundscape of typewriters to prompt journalists to work faster seems highly manipulative.

Woody Harrelson: live cinema pioneer

Posted on by
Reply

Believe it or not, Woody Harrelson pulled it off!

Last week I posted about his audacious plan to to live-stream live cinema. Apparently, other than a few bumpy bits, it worked!

From the Guardian review by Ryan Gilbey:

“Even at its liveliest, cinema can only ever be a refrigerated medium, relaying images to us that were shot months, years even decades earlier. But this week there was an exception to that rule. Woody Harrelson’s directorial debut, Lost in London, was broadcast live to more than 500 cinemas in the US, and one in the UK, as it was being filmed on the streets of the capital at 2am on Friday. As if that were not impressive enough, the picture was shot in a single unbroken 100-minute take with a cast of 30 (plus hundreds of extras) in 14 locations, two black cabs, one police vehicle and a VW camper van festooned with fairy lights. Actors who try their hand as a director typically start off with something small-scale – a sensitive coming-of-age story, say, such as Jodie Foster’s Little Man Tate or Robert De Niro’s A Bronx Tale. With Lost in London, Harrelson went as far in the opposite direction as one can imagine. This was edge-of-the-seat, seat-of-the-pants film-making. He didn’t just jump in at the deep end: he did so into shark-filled waters. … Nothing, though, will quite match the sensation of having watched the messy but miraculous birth of a genuine oddity: part celebrity satire, part mea culpa, part site-specific, one-night-only art installation.”

My take: unfortunately, none of the theatres were located in Canada. Netflix, can you get this please?

Interactive Cinema: CtrlMovie introduces CtrlEdit

Posted on by
1

Does interactivity mesh well with cinema?

Canada has a historical connection to interactive movies: the first one screened at Expo 67, at the Czechoslovakia pavillion. And yet, no matter what path the audience chose, the ending was always the same.

On CMF Trends, Benjamin Hoguet explores CtrlEdit, a new tool for producing interactive movies, from a Swiss company called CtrlMovie.

CtrlMovie allows filmmakers to add:

  1. Buttons during playback to allow the user to influence the story
  2. Dynamic Jump Actions to flexibly jump between segments – at an exact timecode, in a time frame or triggered by user actions
  3. Swipe Mode to allow users to look around in the film by panning the image with swipe gestures
  4. Animated Masks to make objects in the film tappable
  5. Variables to store user decisions, and retrieve them later for a delayed effect on the story
  6. Expressions to evaluate the former actions of the user and to influence the storyline using short java scripts
  7. Separate Multiple Audio Tracks, independent from the video segments and jump actions
  8. Dynamic Overlays to display browser windows and other interactive elements on top of the movie during playback
  9. Subtitles easily to support a wider audience.

Hoguet quotes co-founder Baptiste Planche:

“CtrlEdit is used once all video segments have been edited to incorporate them into an interactive whole. The solution costs nothing to purchase if we are able to set up a revenue sharing system with the producer. It goes without saying that the model is adaptable. For example, if the final project is not profitable, we can set a price for the software license. In all cases, we are very open to encouraging creators to make maximum use of our tool. The only aspect to which we pay attention is compliance with a certain level of quality regardless of the project. At present, we are receiving a lot of requests from creators and producers and some ten or so projects are underway—including two or three at an advanced stage.”

My take: Perhaps CtrlMovie is the middle ground between the almost-full interactivity of video games and the total-cut-scene experience of Hardcore Henry. And yet, I’m not convinced that the audience needs to be ‘in’ the movie; I think it might be engaging enough just to ‘direct’ the story. Third person, not first person. More like Run Lola Run.

Bot storytellers coming soon.

Posted on by
Reply

Benjamin Hoguet on CMF Trends wonders ‘How can chatbots be used to tell stories?‘

Chatbots, or bots, give the impression of a personalized online experience. Interacting with a bot replicates a real world one-on-one exchange, depending on the quality of the AI programming. Just ask Siri, the most famous bot, “How many Apple Store geniuses does it take to screw in a lightbulb?’ or ‘Is Santa real?’ or ‘Tell me a story.”

According to Hoguet:

“It’s the democratization of chatbots that is revolutionary because today anyone can create his or her own chatbot and upload it to a Facebook page, for example.”

He recommends two tools, ChatFuel or PullString.

“‘Narrative chatbots’ are only just beginning to appear. A lot of them set themselves apart only by their capacity to show us what not to do, but that’s the advantage of pioneering projects: to help develop codes and a grammar for those who will follow in their footsteps. Conversing with fictional characters is today’s predominant use of narrative bots.”

Hoguet envisions “the eventual arrival of bot stores. Just like app stores, they will definitely contribute to elevating chatbots to the level of full-fledged distribution platforms.”

My take: this is worth noticing because the top four messaging apps (WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, WeChat, and Viber) have surpassed the top four social networks (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram) in monthly users, according to Business Insider UK. For instance, imagine if Tom Thomson’s tweets were a (messenger) dialogue rather than a (Twitter) broadcast.

VR stats from England

Posted on by
Reply

Charlotte Rogers of Marketing Week in the UK has reported a raft of VR statistics that are very interesting.

Very nice graphs show:

  • Consumer Sentiments on Virtual Reality
  • What Experiences Would You Like to Have When Using Virtual Reality?
  • What Sorts of Places Would You Like to Get Virtuality Reality Content Related to Your Interests From?

In terms of winning content, the survey points to new, unique experiences as being the most diserable:

“The ability to travel to different cities proves the most popular VR application at 56%, followed by being in the crowd at a concert (52%) and fantasy scenarios, such as flying or walking on water (45%).”

See the original Ipsos MORI media release and raw data.

My take: I just don’t know. Is VR/360 a technology in search of it’s killer app? Or — ? I can’t help but remember the trailer for The Matrix — I think we’ve seen this movie before.

The state of VR to date, in one page

Posted on by
Reply

Janessa Nichole White of VR Dribble offers the best summary of Virtual Reality to date.

She summarizes:

  • VR revenue projections
  • VR market demographics
  • VR hardware sales
  • Content that doesn’t work in VR
  • Content that works in VR
  • VR gadgets
  • Privacy and data tracking in VR

Regarding content that works in VR, she lists:

  • Stationary and interactive puzzle games
  • Horror
  • On-rails vehicle
  • Using 1-to-1 motion controls
  • Using head as a cursor
  • Teleporting from place-to-place
  • Travel and music experiences
  • Social engagement
  • 1st person story segments

She closes with:

“The vernacular hasn’t been created. There are many obstacles in building a VR game or story. The hardware still has room to improve. Despite all of the above, it sure is an exciting time to be alive.”

My take: if you think 360 is just a fad, check out Say Lou Lou‘s Blue on Blue music video for a perfect example of the plasticity of cinema — in four dimensions. It will blow your mind.

 

360 is not VR, but still cool

Posted on by
Reply

VR. 360. The next big thing? The same thing?

No, they’re quite different. Blame Apple’s Quicktime VR for mixing up the two. (Released in 1994, QTVR was essentially a single frame from any of today’s 360 videos, not truly a virtual reality environment.)

Raindance‘s Baptiste Charles-Aubert makes a pointed distinction: ‘360 is immersive as opposed to VR which is interactive‘:

“In a Virtual Reality setting, the viewer/player leads. With 360, as filmmakers, we need to keep control over the narrative and push it forward. That’s what happens with 360. The viewer is experiencing a story happening around him and not to him. The physical location then matters even more in 360.”

One neat example of 360 documentary filmmaking is a series of Paul McCartney ‘interviews’ by Jaunt.

Their 360 technology is impressive, with no discernible ‘stitching‘.

My take: If the selfie is the painted self-portrait digitized, what is the equivalent documentary or narrative film? Will it utilize VR or 360? Or are those technologies reserved for something else? The modern, introspective equivalent of album liner notes, perhaps?

A film festival for every film

Posted on by
Reply

With something like over 3,000 active film festivals around the world, there’s a film festival for every type of film.

And now, there’s even one dedicated to drone filming: FRiFF.

Filmmakers looking for validation from juries can search for suitable festivals on Withoutabox or FilmFreeway.

Just be sure festival exposure is a component of your overall distribution and marketing strategy.

My take: that’s it — I’m going to start my own film festival. Coming to cyberspace soon! Even if Robert Redford once said there are too many film festivals….